Analysis Problem of the Day 47

Today’s problem is Problem 11 from UCLA’s Fall 2001 Analysis Qual:

Problem 11: Let F \in H(\mathbb{D}) \cap C(\overline{\mathbb{D}}).

a) Prove \lim_{\lambda \to 1} F(\lambda z) = F(z) uniformly on \overline{\mathbb{D}}.

b) F(z) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n z^n on \mathbb{D}. Prove that \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n = 0.


Solution: a) Since F is continuous on a compact set, it is uniformly continuous, i.e. for any \epsilon>0 there exists a \delta>0 such that |z-w|<\delta \implies |F(z)-F(w)|<\epsilon. Now, since |\lambda z-z|<\delta when |\lambda-1|<\delta, it follows that |F(\lambda z)-F(z)|<\epsilon whenever |\lambda-1|<\delta, i.e. \lim_{\lambda \to 1} F(\lambda z) = F(z) uniformly on \overline{\mathbb{D}}.

b) Setting z=r e^{i\theta}, we get by convergence of holomorphic functions on their disc of convergence that for every 0 < r < 1,

    \[g_r(e^{i\theta}):=F(re^{i\theta}) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty r^n a_n e^{i n \theta},\]

which is a continuous 2\pi-periodic function that therefore admits a Fourier series. By uniqueness of Fourier coefficients, it follows \widehat{g_r}(n)= r^n a_n. Let g_1(e^{i\theta}):=F(e^{i\theta}). By a), g_r \to g_1 uniformly, so since the Fourier transform is a bounded operator from L^1 to l^\infty, it follows that g_r \to g_1 in L^1, i.e. \widehat{g_r} \to \widehat{g_1} in l^\infty. But \widehat{g_r}(n) \to 0 as n \to \infty, so \widehat{g_1}(n) \to 0 as n \to \infty. But \widehat{g_r}(n) \to a_n pointwise as r \to 1, so by uniqueness of limits, it follows that \widehat{g_1}(n)=a_n \to 0, i.e. \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n=0.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *